The quote is from Plato. This blog seeks to understand how micro-actions can be used by participants - often termed 'beneficiaries' in international development - to drive their own acquisition of resources, internal or external, to maintain quality of life.
I was touched to learn that Albert Hirschman died on December 10th. He warned us about unintended consequences of development actions, for which I’m grateful. He also taught us how three mechanisms – exit, voice and loyalty – relate directly to the role of democracy, markets and reciprocity in the state, the economy and civil society. People have most power when they can change or exit without serious danger or cost, as consumers, voters or supporters or citizens. Exit is not always possible, in which case strengthening participative voice is important. In Hirschman’s third mechanism, states and agencies need to maintain the loyalty of their stakeholders based on belief in the value of what they do. Continued loyalty requires negotiation through voice backed up by the threat of exit. I spoke yesterday with a Zimbabwean living in the United States about my enthusiasm for engaging with young people in southern Africa and helping them gain the knowledge of their own strengths, rights and responsibilities in society through completing micro-actions clustered into challenges. He loved the simplicity of the structure, but was worried about unintended consequences. He wasn’t calling it that, and was struggling to articulate his concerns. I offered him Hirschman’s phrase and he said “yes, exactly!” Thank you, Albert, for making me look brighter than I am! But why was my Zimbabwean friend concerned about unintended consequences of teaching young people to believe in their capacity to develop their own circumstances? Well, he was worried about their frustration when they learn what they could do but can’t do it because they do not have access to resources and the opportunities for...Learn More
I watched the BBC’s The Trouble with Aid with my wife, who does not work in development or humanitarian aid. She was very troubled by the issues. So was I, of course, all over again. I was impressed by the honesty of Dr Randolph Kent of King’s College London, in the debate afterwards: One of the fundamental failures of the UN, of the agencies…of the system as a whole, is that we don’t really know how to engage with people effectively – those who are vulnerable, who are in need of assistance. And this is a really fundamental problem. (Dr. Randolph Kent, ex-UN, now with the Humanitarian Futures Programme) BBC: The Trouble with Aid: The Debate (till 16/12/12) I was also glad to see Hugo Slim beeing consulted. His writing is warm, humane, instructive and beautifully crafted. Here are three recommendations from his papers on humanitarian aid: ‘Doing the right thing: relief agencies, moral dilemmas and moral responsibility in political emergencies and war’, Studies on Emergencies and Disaster Relief, no. 6, Nordiska Afrikainstitute, pp. 3–11. (1997) ‘Dissolving the difference between humanitarianism and development: the mixing of a rights-based solution’, Development in Practice, vol. 10, nos. 3–4, pp. 491–494. (2000) ‘A call to alms: humanitarian action and the art of war’, Opinion, Geneva, Centre for Humanitarian Dialogue, February...Learn More
When I am in an area of relative poverty compared to my home country, I am sometimes aware that I am paying over the local market price or being in some way ‘fiddled’. I have a souvenir from Koi Chang hanging in my kitchen that reminds me how well a beach trader ran rings round this MBA. I liked his product better than the one I had bought only minutes earlier and wanted to swap. I ended up giving him my first purchase and some money in exchange for one of his products. He walked down the beach with exactly the same number of items to sell and some spare cash. I was embarrassed by his superior skills and mocked by my wife. But the relative value of my drop in holiday pocket money was dwarfed by his increased earnings for the day in real terms. My money was entering the local economy and probably more useful there in than back in the UK. In the development sector, we are very sensitive about corruption and the need to verify that our aid has gone to the right people and been spent on the specified inputs. If the UK government, for example, are to persuade the media to let them spend 0.7% of income on development, they need to win the argument on fiduciary risk (see this Telegraph attack). And none of us want to see food or medical supplies siphoned off from charitable donations to be sold commercially. I attended an event at Christian Aid where a few people, including an economist from the UK DFID spoke about value for money....Learn More